Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

29-05-20, 09:08AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 46305
  • Total Topics: 937
  • Online Today: 80
  • Online Ever: 483
  • (25-02-20, 02:44PM)
Users Online

Author Topic: What's the procedure for absence, when is a welcome back out of process  (Read 10220 times)

brappy

  • VLH Supporter
  • Newbie
  • ******
  • Posts: 32
Have Tesco changed their rules on welcome backs having to be done within the first 24hrs or its out of process?
Could someone link me to the policy please if possible, I have searched everywhere!
Also, does anyone know if it's standard procedure to receive a written warning for absence at 5% in an AR when you've been genuinely sick?
Thanks in advance

londoner83

  • VLH Supporter
  • Smart Arse
  • ******
  • Posts: 944
Welcome backs should be done before you start your shift on certain fresh areas like counters or during your shift for everywhere else.

Warnings are given for not attending work. Just because you have been genuinely sick does not mean a warning can't be issued. However the managers should consider the big picture ie have u had other absences in the previous 6 months; are there any trends (ie always sick at payday or before holiday) and is absence linked to any underlying health issues.

If you are in Usdaw always take a rep into AR meetings

80377494

  • Regular Pain
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Welcome backs are sometimes missed on the day of return because colleagues don't inform the duty manager that they have returned after an absence, which they are supposed to do. Did you notify the duty manager when you returned to work?
Unfortunately, managers don't know everybody who has been absent, they may have been absent themselves.

brappy

  • VLH Supporter
  • Newbie
  • ******
  • Posts: 32
Yeah duty was aware but never got around to it. I'm just curious if this welcome back that was done a day late should have been used in my % calculation.

First written seems a bit harsh when you've never had any next steps or a verbal.

lucgeo

  • VLH Supporter
  • Sad Muppet
  • ******
  • Posts: 2401
If it's not done on the day, and you have informed duty of your return to work at the beginning of your shift, then it is out of process, therefore the warning cannot stand, and cannot be used to escalate in future.
Live for today. Learn from yesterday.

brappy

  • VLH Supporter
  • Newbie
  • ******
  • Posts: 32
I have asked in work and apparently it's 3 days before its out of process

lucgeo

  • VLH Supporter
  • Sad Muppet
  • ******
  • Posts: 2401
Who told you that  ???
Live for today. Learn from yesterday.

oldfashionedplayer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54

lucgeo

  • VLH Supporter
  • Sad Muppet
  • ******
  • Posts: 2401
That is for the absence review meeting....not the welcome back meeting....which is to ascertain if you are fit to return to work, a question you should be asked on the day of your return to work.....where you have to declare and sign you are fit to return...3 days later?? My arse!!! :-X  :-X
« Last Edit: 23-09-18, 06:45PM by lucgeo »
Live for today. Learn from yesterday.

oldfashionedplayer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
doesn't seem to say anything otherthan they aim for the first 24 hours on a welcome back, but if not then they would give you a time and date, both sickness and welcome are in the same policies, the sickness says up to 8 days depending on part time or full time to sort it out, welcome back review doesn't specify dates in the examples nor in the policy, so either they both apply to the same 8 day rule of time / arrangement if not sorted within first 24 hours, or it's just been left out completely and there isn't a timeflow which is unlikely. lol

mexicopete

  • VLH Supporter
  • Smart Arse
  • ******
  • Posts: 985
That is for the absence review meeting....not the welcome back meeting....which is to ascertain if you are fit to return to work, a question you should be asked on the day of your return to work.....where you have to declare and sign you are fit to return...3 days later?? My arse!!! :-X  :-X
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
The worlds me lobster

lucgeo

  • VLH Supporter
  • Sad Muppet
  • ******
  • Posts: 2401
Unless the policies have drastically changed......report to duty on your first day back, who should then arrange a welcome back meeting, either before your shift starts for certain fresh depts....or during your shift on that day...the absence review should only take place, if you are over the % of absence and then should be conducted within the timescale of the 8th day being the last day. If the welcome back is not done on the first day of your return to work, then it voids any absence review as it is out of process, and as such should not proceed and can not be used for consideration in future absence reviews or upscaling any warnings.
Live for today. Learn from yesterday.

Nomad

  • Administrator
  • Sad Muppet
  • ******
  • Posts: 6671
  • Who dares, wins.
No WB then no AR. If no WB took place then there was no absence ( technically ), as the no WB made it out of process.
Nomad ( Forum Admin )
It's better to be up in arms than down on your knees.

claden

  • Smart Arse
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
I always go for it being out of process if the WB isn't done on the first day but there is nothing in the policy that says what is or isn't out of process it's just guidelines which I always quote at them and they either have never read the policy so have no idea or don't know if what I'm saying is actually a fact lol

Unsung heroes

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
WBM don't technically have a time scale. If you work with fresh foods and you've been off with a virus then you should hand it done at the earliest opportunity. If you work with machinery ie back door then this is also the case but a WBM doesn't necessarily need to be done on your first shift back.no clear time scales but if WBM isn't done till 3rd day then management can't count ARM as 7 days from that point as well be out of process.

Preacherpauly

  • Regular Pain
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Lets be honest, no one at tesco has any clue what the policies are for pretty much anything.

A good union rep would know straight away about all this as its their job to DEFEND you. If your union rep does not know then you should be asking them why they don't know.

Me2015

  • VLH Supporter
  • Regular Pain
  • ******
  • Posts: 171

Metal Mario

  • VLH Supporter
  • Regular Pain
  • ******
  • Posts: 166
While I'd agree they are there to ensure a fair hearing, lets face it, the ineptitude of most managers to follow process puts them into a defensive role by default.
In the kingdom of the blind, the one eyed man is king.

Ulsterboy

  • Know All
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Preacherpauly , the phrase you use for union reps is " their job". Wrong , union reps aren't paid .

Duracell

  • Sad Muppet
  • ******
  • Posts: 2729
Lets be honest, no one at tesco has any clue what the policies are for pretty much anything.

A good union rep would know straight away about all this as its their job to DEFEND you. If your union rep does not know then you should be asking them why they don't know.

So in answer to the OP, all WB/RTW related to Sickness Absence Must be done within the first shift back.

As for the interpretation of defend and whether it is apt, I would like you to consider that predominantly if an individual finds themselves being questioned, then they do inherently have to defend themselves.
My Opinion is exactly that, Mine.  Based on my view of what I know , see and what I would do.
"Being a rep doesn't make a person right anymore than not being a rep makes a person wrong " 

Duracell.

Shafted

  • Know All
  • ****
  • Posts: 211
Yeah duty was aware but never got around to it. I'm just curious if this welcome back that was done a day late should have been used in my % calculation.

First written seems a bit harsh when you've never had any next steps or a verbal.
The warning process for absence is slightly different and has no verbal warning just a first absence warning etc.

Minnie Mouse

  • VLH Supporter
  • Jr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 68
Wonder if someone can help asking for a friend, been off work long term, being told they are to get a phased in back at work but they have to use holidays so to get full pay as their sick pay is up can someone tell me what the process is and do they have to use their holidays or just get paid the reduced hours that they work Thank You

Miss Piggy

  • Know All
  • ****
  • Posts: 236
Yeah duty was aware but never got around to it. I'm just curious if this welcome back that was done a day late should have been used in my % calculation.

First written seems a bit harsh when you've never had any next steps or a verbal.
Yeah duty was aware but never got around to it. I'm just curious if this welcome back that was done a day late should have been used in my % calculation.

First written seems a bit harsh when you've never had any next steps or a verbal.

On both counts, very good reasons to appeal in my opinion.

Redshoes

  • Smart Arse
  • *****
  • Posts: 699
Wonder if someone can help asking for a friend, been off work long term, being told they are to get a phased in back at work but they have to use holidays so to get full pay as their sick pay is up can someone tell me what the process is and do they have to use their holidays or just get paid the reduced hours that they work Thank You

Have to consider using holdays. Someone who has been off long term may have used up sick pay and if that is the case they will be unpaid for shortfall in hours. By using hols it prevents this. Also, if holdays have built up whilst off it is a sensible way forward but it should be agreed.

londoner83

  • VLH Supporter
  • Smart Arse
  • ******
  • Posts: 944
Any return to work programme should be agrees between colleague and manager. Working reduced hours will lead to reduced pay and may well cause a employee stress, which is the last thing anyone recovering from a long term illness needs.

The holiday period ends in March and any outstanding holidays will have to be used up. Using holidays to make up shortfall in hours seems sensible.

The only other option to consider is could the employee take a 3-4 week block of holiday now (fully paid) and then return to work on their contractual hours.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk